.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts

Sign of the times: Fed require NYC to change all street signs


As some on the left scoff at the right’s complaints about unfunded federal mandates and the need for greater 10th Amendment protection, I offer up Exhibit A.  This is how the Feds cause states to bust their budgets.
New York Daily News: The city will change the lettering on every single street sign - at an estimated cost of about $27.5 million - because the feds don't like the font.
Street names will change from all capital letters to a combination of upper and lower case on roads across the country thanks to the pricey federal regulation, officials said Wednesday.
By 2018, MADISON AVE. will become Madison Ave. and will be printed in a font called Clearview, the city Department of Transportation says.
The Federal Highway Administration says the switch will improve safety because drivers identify the words more quickly when they're displayed that way - and can sooner return their eyes to the road.
Still, several city residents were OUTRAGED.
The city has about 250,000 signs, and it costs about $110 to replace one, the DOT says. Officials said the new signs will have improved reflectivity and clarity for nighttime drivers. […]
The changes are among many in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices that regularly changes to improve road safety, highway administration spokesman Doug Hecox said. The mixed upper- and lowercase rule was adopted in 2003, but municipalities were given until 2018 to comply completely, Hecox said. [MORE] 
New York City is currently running a $4 billion deficit for fiscal year 2009-2010 and the state needs to close a $47 billion budget gap.  In a sane and orderly world, New York should be able to decide if and when something like street sign changes are necessary and affordable. 

Sooner or later, states must exert their rights to determine when and where money is to be spent. Otherwise the wasteful spending disease from Washington will continue to spread.

Via: Reuters

Andrew Cuomo gets busted lying about voting for Mayor Bloomberg


Do you want to know how Carl Paladino is only six points behind Andrew Cuomo in the race for New York governor?  Take a look at this video and then read the excerpt from CBS News below it.

CBS News: But for all his actions as the state’s chief law enforcement officer, Cuomo did have a little problem with telling the truth about his election box support for Mayor Bloomberg.
“Have I voted for the mayor? Yes,” Cuomo said.
Actually, he didn’t. The Cuomo campaign had to issue a clarification, saying he was only registered to vote in New York City in 2005 when he endorsed Democrat Fernando Ferrer.
This is exactly what voters have grown so sick and tired of. Of course Cuomo will give the classic “misspoke” response, but come on.  How is it that you and I can remember every candidate we voted for since turning 18, and these so called “great leaders of our time” cannot even recall who they voted for mayor in 2005?

The truth is Cuomo was probably did not have the cojones to say he did not vote for Bloomberg with the man standing just two feet away. If Cuomo doesn't have the balls to face a mildly embarrassing moment, how on earth will this man stand up to Alabany if elected?

The Paladino campaign did not waste a hot second to capitalize on this:
The Paladino team used the faux pas to taunt Cuomo about not yet agreeing to debates.
Paladino spokesman Caputo said “Perhaps that’s why Andrew is afraid to debate. He misspeaks so much he fears facing the voters.” 
If Cuomo keeps sticking his foot in his mouth like this, the Tea Party will be planting a flag in the New York governor’s office.

Via: CBS News 
Video h/t: News Busters

Quinnipiac: Cuomo vs. Paladino 49-43


Oh snap! Quinnipiac says Crazy Carl is within spitting distance from Andrew Cuomo!

Republican Carl Paladino, aided by a 4 -1 margin among Tea Partiers, trails New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, the Democratic candidate for Governor, 49 - 43 percent among likely voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. 
Only 18 percent of New York State likely voters consider themselves part of the Tea Party movement, but they back Paladino 77 - 18 percent. 
Cuomo leads 87 - 8 percent among Democrats while Paladino leads 83 - 13 percent among Republicans and 49 - 43 percent among independent voters, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University survey, conducted by live interviewers, finds. This first likely voter general election survey in New York in this election cycle cannot be compared with earlier surveys of registered voters.  [MORE]

I really should not be surprised with this result.  New Yorkers have grown very tired of business as usual in New York. Unfortunately, Andrew Cuomo could not be a better example of business as usual. From his family name to his lengthy history in NY politics, Cuomo is the establishment and the establishment is not what voters are looking for this year. 
Quinnipiac:  When asked which quality matters most in picking a candidate for governor, 41 percent of New York State likely voters want a candidate who "can bring about needed change to Albany." Another 22 percent want someone who shares their values, while 21 percent want someone honest and trustworthy and 10 percent want someone with the right experience.  
Cuomo is going to have to do two things in order to win, first, which may be mission impossible, he has to portray himself as fresh, new and outside the establishment.  This will be no easy feat, considering how well known he is to New Yorkers. The thing he has to do is define Paladino before Paladino defines himself.  Quinnipiac makes clear that most New Yorkers don’t really know who Carl Paladino is. 
Paladino gets a 36 - 31 percent favorability and 31 percent of voters don't know enough about him to form an opinion.  
For Paladino, it is crucial that he defines himself early before Cuomo or the New York media does it for him.  Paladino, just like Christine O’Donnell, have a plethora of past statements and actions that the opposition can make great hay over. Paladino may have already realized this and perhaps that is why he is launching such harsh broadsides against Cuomo (and they seem to be working).

Also like O’Donnell, Paladino’s greatest strength is that he has clean hands when it comes to the current mess in NY, thus making him far more credible than Cuomo when he says he will change NY politics.

I am glad I no longer live in New York.  Picking a candidate in this election would be very difficult.  I have no faith that Rick Lazio could ever effectively deal with the sharks in Albany.  Andrew Cuomo, despite what he says, is just more of the same failed tax and spend policies that Democrats have been offering New Yorkers for years.  Finally, Carl Paladino seems like a great leap into the unknown.  I certainly do not envy New York voters this year.